








7.2| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
10 2 |
9 6 |
7.8 10 |
5 8 |
6.3 3 |
10 1 |
7.4 30 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
9.7 3 |
10 2 |
6.3 6 |
10 1 |
- 0 |
8.2 13 |
| Total: Votes: |
10 4 |
8.2 34 |
6.8 74 |
6.9 57 |
6.7 8 |
7 3 |
7.2 202 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Actually it was pretty good. Somehow I prefer the other guy being the boss then Tom as he just is not "The GUY" for it. If you know what I mean.
8/10
shazjoao@ - 868 reviews
29.12.2011
One of the best spy movies ever! I want to see it every week!
10/10
connorhw1@ - 403 reviews
29.10.2011
A little bit better than the first one, it has some good action scenes, but it was just missing something.
6/10
lil_shorty_69er@ - 356 reviews
6.1.2011 - age: 18-25
I don't like this film anywhere as much as I liked the first one but having said that this film was still very entertaining I like Tom Cruise in this show and also they other characters like Ving Rhames awesome show still though the plot is a little strange in my mind so they create an incurable virus ya that's not quite what I had in mind when I went to see this although like I said before still pretty good.
8/10
ducksrule@ - 216 reviews
18.9.2009 - age: 18-25
The best action movie ever made with National Treasure. Tom Cruise is a great actor and a master of suspense and adventure. A must-see for every action fan.
10/10
blackswan_20@ - first review
3.8.2005 - age: 13-17
A classic action movie. Tom Cruise's best yet.
10/10
waynetpat@ - 19 reviews
18.5.2004 - age: 50+
Decent film, typical of a sequel, not quite as good as the first one. Still exciting and action-packed, although a little predictable.
7/10
patnkat@ - 115 reviews
26.12.2003 - age: 26-35
Horrible sequel. The main character seemed to not have any tie to the guy in the first movie. The story was horrible. The plot predictable and the action unbelievable.
3/10
dominicproctor@ - 341 reviews
13.12.2003 - age: 36-49